|You are here: Main / Customer Services / Public Communications Division / 2008 / Executive Summary For Honolulu Rail Transit Draft Environmental Impact Statement To Be Online|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO BE ONLINE
Latest Findings: Rail Will Shrink Future Traffic Congestion
by More than 20 Percent, Among Many Benefits
The executive summary of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for
Clarifications must be made to several chapters of the DEIS to ensure consistency with the state Environmental Impact Statement requirements. Those clarifications are expected to be completed shortly. The City intends to post the entire document on the project website over the weekend.
Printed versions and formal transmittals to the State distribution centers and announcement of availability of the printed copies are expected to take about 2 weeks.
Once the availability of the document is formally announced in the Federal Register and in the State Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) Bulletin, the public and agencies will be invited to comment during the public comment period of at least 45 days. The public may submit written comments to the Department of Transportation Services (DTS) or provide oral comments during public hearings.
The DEIS examines the environmental, economic and community impacts and benefits of 4 future alternatives between Kapolei and UH Manoa: 3 potential routes for a rail transit line from Kapolei to
“The DEIS greatly refines the work done previously in the Alternatives Analysis (AA), bringing the project’s details into even sharper focus,” said
As expected, the DEIS cost estimate, adjusted for inflation, from 2006 to 2008, is $3.9 billion. The increase is well within the contingency built into the cost estimate and the revenue forecast from the General Excise and Use Tax and Federal Transit Administration.
“Our cost estimate includes a nearly $1 billion contingency to address these cost changes,” Mayor Hannemann said. “Additionally, we believe that the current economic slowdown may result in lower construction costs and I remain confident that we have the funds to build this project.
“Independent analysis shows that our projections are sound. Bank of Hawaii Chief Economist Dr. Paul Brewbaker, who chairs the state Council on Revenues, noted that original estimates were reasonable, pointing out that the business cycle tends to balance periods of slow growth and even decline in GET revenue with periods of more rapid revenue growth.”
“I’m very pleased to say the information in the DEIS validates the Honolulu City Council’s decision to move forward with rail transit and the benefits it can bring to our island.”
Earlier in the month, the Hawaii Business Roundtable had conducted an independent financial analysis that made it clear that there were no insurmountable obstacles for the city to proceed with its rail transit project. HBR’s support was later followed by the endorsement of the Chamber of Commerce of Hawaii.
Mayor Hannemann reiterated that the City will not begin construction until
Highlights of DEIS Impacts and Costs
Traffic congestion would be reduced between 21 and 23 percent island-wide in the year 2030 depending on the rail route, compared to the “No Build” scenario. With reduced congestion, travelers will save significant time whether they travel by rail, bus or private vehicle. For example, in 2030, morning rush hour commuters to downtown from Kapolei would save an average of 30 minutes by using rail; from Ewa, morning commuters would save 25 minutes; from
Overall, the Build Alternatives will deliver approximately 50,000 hours of daily travel time savings for commuters in 2030.
Ridership on the
Energy, Water and Air
The DEIS confirms that future energy consumption will be reduced with rail transit, as will water contamination and air pollution.
Estimated construction costs for the eight-year fixed guideway construction period, in Fiscal Year 2008 dollars (FY2008):
· Airport route – $4.1 billion.
In inflation adjusted, year of expenditure dollars, the construction estimate for the
Either route is affordable with identified funding sources.
Operating and Maintenance costs
Annual operating and maintenance costs for each route in 2030 are similar to previous estimates. They range from $63 million for the
The economic impact of building the fixed guideway is validated with an estimated 11,000 jobs created during the construction phase.
Between 152 and 177 parcels could be impacted with a partial acquisition for the fixed guideway’s right-of-way; about 35 of the parcels would be full acquisitions, depending on the route selected. Previously, about 150 parcels had been identified as possibly impacted.
The project’s potential visual effects include removing trees, altering Ewa-Koko Head and mauka-makai views, and introducing project components that are out of scale or character with their settings in several areas. Tree removal would be minimized.
Substantially more noise analysis has been added to the DEIS, validating previous noise discussions. Noise levels of the proposed transit vehicles will be less than many vehicles already in traffic, such as dump trucks, city buses, trucks and other autos. Eighteen to 23 residential buildings would experience moderate noise impacts, depending on the route.
Historic and Cultural Resources
The project team has identified known historic and cultural resources along the route in more detail than the AA; seven resources are identified as possibly adversely affected.
Groundbreaking is scheduled for late 2009 and building would begin in
Media contact: Department of Transportation Services Director
Wayne Yoshioka, 768-8303
|Thursday, October 30, 2008|